GeForce GTX 295 vs Quadro K5000M
When comparing GeForce GTX 295 and Quadro K5000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Quadro K5000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 295
Quadro K5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K5000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Quadro K5000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 189% more power consumption, than Quadro K5000M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K5000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1788 GB more memory, than Quadro K5000M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K5000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K5000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 536 MHz higher, than Quadro K5000M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K5000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K5000M is 2001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Battlefield 5 is 227% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 295 and Quadro K5000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 98% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Dota 2 is 78% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Far Cry 5 is 214% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 225% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 130% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Minecraft is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 162% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 210% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in World of Tanks is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Quadro K5000M | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GT200B | N14E-Q5 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 1 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 240 | 1344 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 706 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 67.31 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 1,615 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 51 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |