GeForce GTX 295 vs Quadro M4000
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 295 and Quadro M4000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 295 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M4000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 295
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295
Quadro M4000
Power consumption (TDP)
289 Watt
120 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
6-pin & 8-pin
1 x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1792 MB
8 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI
4x DisplayPort
Check Price
GeForce GTX 295 has 140% more power consumption, than Quadro M4000.
GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M4000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GeForce GTX 295 has 1784 GB more memory, than Quadro M4000.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M4000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 469 MHz higher, than Quadro M4000.
GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro M4000 - by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro M4000 is 231 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 295.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000 is 5009 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
35−40
ultra / 1080p
2−3
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
14−16
60−65
medium / 1080p
5−6
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
high / 1080p
−
55−60
ultra / 1080p
7−8
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
18−20
100−110
medium / 1080p
8−9
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
30−35
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
low / 768p
120−130
250−260
medium / 768p
90−95
220−230
ultra / 1080p
40−45
180−190
QHD / 1440p
24−27
110−120
4K / 2160p
18−20
70−75
high / 768p
65−70
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
low / 768p
80−85
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
medium / 1080p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Quadro M4000.
low / 768p
75−80
120−130
medium / 768p
50−55
110−120
ultra / 1080p
27−30
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Dota 2 is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
high / 1080p
5−6
45−50
ultra / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
2−3
14−16
low / 720p
14−16
80−85
medium / 1080p
6−7
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 585% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
high / 1080p
12−14
60−65
ultra / 1080p
7−8
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
50−55
180−190
medium / 1080p
14−16
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Fortnite is 363% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
high / 1080p
7−8
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
20−22
100−110
medium / 1080p
9−10
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 550% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
low / 768p
45−50
140−150
medium / 768p
−
120−130
high / 1080p
8−9
70−75
ultra / 1080p
5−6
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 315% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
high / 1080p
3−4
24−27
ultra / 1080p
1−2
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
8−9
65−70
medium / 1080p
4−5
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
low / 768p
85−90
130−140
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
85−90
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
7−8
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
8−9
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
low / 768p
16−18
130−140
medium / 768p
12−14
85−90
high / 1080p
6−7
45−50
ultra / 1080p
5−6
24−27
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 630% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
50−55
high / 768p
30−35
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295
Quadro M4000
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Maxwell 2.0
Code name
GT200B
GM204
Type
Desktop
Workstation
Release date
8 January 2009
29 June 2015
Pipelines
240
1664
Core clock speed
1242 MHz
773 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
92.2 billion/sec
80.39
Floating-point performance
2x 596.2 gflops
2,573 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
241 mm
Memory bus width
896 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
999 MHz
6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth
223.8 GB/s
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12
Shader Model
4.0
5
OpenGL
2.1
4.5
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
+
CUDA
+
5.2
CUDA cores
480
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
299 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
Width
1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays
4
nView Desktop Management
+
Multi-display synchronization
Quadro Sync
High-Performance Video I/O6
+
CUDA cores per GPU
240
Standard memory config per GPU
896 MB
Memory interface width per GPU
448 Bit
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)
128bit
Check Price