GeForce GTX 295 vs Quadro M620
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 295 and Quadro M620 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 295 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M620 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 295
Quadro M620 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M620 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M620 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Quadro M620 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 863% more power consumption, than Quadro M620.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1790 GB more memory, than Quadro M620.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M620 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M620 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 224 MHz higher, than Quadro M620.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro M620 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M620 is 4013 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 295 and Quadro M620 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 87% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Dota 2 is 65% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Far Cry 5 is 185% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Fortnite is 118% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Grand Theft Auto V is 115% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Minecraft is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 137% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in World of Tanks is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Quadro M620 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | GT200B | |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 13 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 1018 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| Check Price |