GeForce GTX 295 vs Quadro T1000
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 295 and Quadro T1000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 295 will be the best choice, for others Quadro T1000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 295
Quadro T1000
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Quadro T1000 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 478% more power consumption, than Quadro T1000.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro T1000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro T1000 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 153 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro T1000 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 7001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Quadro T1000. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 585% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 363% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 550% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 315% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 630% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Quadro T1000 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Turing |
| Code name | GT200B | TU117 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 27 May 2019 |
| Pipelines | 240 | |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 1395 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 4,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |