GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon 540X
When comparing GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon 540X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon 540X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 295
Radeon 540X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon 540X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon 540X here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon 540X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 478% more power consumption, than Radeon 540X.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon 540X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1790 GB more memory, than Radeon 540X.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Radeon 540X - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon 540X - with GCN 4.0.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon 540X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon 540X is 5001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540X in Battlefield 5 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540X in Dota 2 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540X in Far Cry 5 is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540X in Fortnite is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540X in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540X in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540X in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540X in Minecraft is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540X in World of Tanks is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon 540X | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | GT200B | Lexa |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 12 August 2019 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 33.47 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 112.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| Check Price |