GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 4830
When comparing GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon HD 4830, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon HD 4830 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 295
Radeon HD 4830
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon HD 4830 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 204% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 4830.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1280 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 4830.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 4830 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 667 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4830.
- GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon HD 4830 are manufactured by 55 nm process technology.
- Radeon HD 4830 is 236 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 295.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 4830 is 801 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Battlefield 5 is 83% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4830 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Fortnite is 31% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Forza Horizon 4 is 71% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Grand Theft Auto V is 30% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 166% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 140% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon HD 4830 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | TeraScale |
| Code name | GT200B | RV770 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 21 October 2008 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 18.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 736.0 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | 246 mm |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |