GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 6950M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon HD 6950M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon HD 6950M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 295
Radeon HD 6950M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6950M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6950M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon HD 6950M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 478% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 6950M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon HD 6950M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1790 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 6950M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 6950M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 6950M - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 662 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6950M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 6950M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 99 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6950M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Battlefield 5 is 81% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Dota 2 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Far Cry 5 is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Fortnite is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Forza Horizon 4 is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Grand Theft Auto V is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Minecraft is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in World of Tanks is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon HD 6950M | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Terascale 2 |
Code name | GT200B | Blackcomb Pro |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 6 January 2011 |
Pipelines | 240 | 960 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 580 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 27.84 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 1,113.6 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M275
- Radeon HD 6950M vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- Radeon HD 6950M vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GT 755M
- Radeon HD 6950M vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Radeon HD 6950M vs GeForce GT 755M