GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 7750M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon HD 7750M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 295 stacks up against Radeon HD 7750M, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 295
Radeon HD 7750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7750M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon HD 7750M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 28 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 932% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7750M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1790 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7750M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 7750M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 7750M - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 667 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7750M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7750M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 7750M is 3001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon HD 7750M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon HD 7750M have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7750M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7750M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7750M in Dota 2 is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Far Cry 5 is 12% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7750M in Fortnite is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon HD 7750M have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Minecraft is 12% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon HD 7750M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon HD 7750M have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon HD 7750M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon HD 7750M | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | GT200B | Lombok XL |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 24 April 2012 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 18.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 588.8 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| Check Price |