GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 7850M
When choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon HD 7850M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon HD 7850M.
GeForce GTX 295
Radeon HD 7850M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7850M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7850M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon HD 7850M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 40 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 622% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7850M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon HD 7850M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1790 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7850M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 7850M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 7850M - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 567 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7850M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7850M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 7850M is 3001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7850M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7850M in Battlefield 5 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7850M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7850M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon HD 7850M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7850M in Dota 2 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7850M in Far Cry 5 is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7850M in Fortnite is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7850M in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7850M in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7850M in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7850M in Minecraft is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7850M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7850M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7850M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7850M in World of Tanks is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon HD 7850M | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN |
Code name | GT200B | Heathrow Pro |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 24 April 2012 |
Pipelines | 240 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 675 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 27.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |