GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge
When comparing GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 295
Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 12-45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 2308% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge - with GCN 1.2/2.0.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge in Call of Duty: Warzone is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge in Dota 2 is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Far Cry 5 is 12% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge in Fortnite is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Minecraft is 12% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 1.2/2.0 |
Code name | GT200B | Bristol Ridge |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 1 June 2016 |
Pipelines | 240 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 800 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 3100 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M275
- Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 295 vs UHD Graphics 630
- GeForce GTX 295 vs UHD Graphics 617
- Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge vs UHD Graphics 630
- Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge vs UHD Graphics 617