GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R5 M435
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R5 M435 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 295 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R5 M435 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 295
Radeon R5 M435
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon R5 M435 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R5 M435 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1790 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 M435.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R5 M435 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 462 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 M435.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 M435 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R5 M435 is 3501 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Battlefield 5 is 83% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Fortnite is 31% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Forza Horizon 4 is 71% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Grand Theft Auto V is 30% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 166% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 140% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon R5 M435 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GT200B | Jet |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 15 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1030 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 20.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 547.2 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 36 GB/s |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |