GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R6 M340DX
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R6 M340DX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 295 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R6 M340DX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 295
Radeon R6 M340DX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R6 M340DX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R6 M340DX here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon R6 M340DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R6 M340DX uses IGP interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R6 M340DX - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R6 M340DX - with GCN.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R6 M340DX - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Radeon R6 M340DX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Battlefield 5 is 37% more, than Radeon R6 M340DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R6 M340DX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 34% more, than Radeon R6 M340DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than Radeon R6 M340DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Dota 2 is 33% more, than Radeon R6 M340DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Far Cry 5 is 60% more, than Radeon R6 M340DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Fortnite is 31% more, than Radeon R6 M340DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Radeon R6 M340DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | − | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Radeon R6 M340DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Radeon R6 M340DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Minecraft is 10% more, than Radeon R6 M340DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Radeon R6 M340DX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon R6 M340DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than Radeon R6 M340DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Radeon R6 M340DX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon R6 M340DX | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | GT200B | Jet |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 3 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 704 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1030 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 24.72 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| Check Price |