GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R7 M365X
When comparing GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R7 M365X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R7 M365X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 295
Radeon R7 M365X
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1788 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M365X.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 342 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M365X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 M365X is 1 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Battlefield 5 is 57% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Far Cry 5 is 80% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Fortnite is 25% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Forza Horizon 4 is 71% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 140% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GT200B | Litho |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 240 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 690 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 23.04 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
FreeSync | + | |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 6 | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |