GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R7 M460
When choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R7 M460, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R7 M460.
GeForce GTX 295
Radeon R7 M460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M460 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon R7 M460 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1790 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M460.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M460 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 M460 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 258 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M460.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M460 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 M460 is 1001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R7 M460 have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Dota 2 is 6% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Far Cry 5 is 40% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Fortnite is 15% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Forza Horizon 4 is 9% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Minecraft is 3% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R7 M460 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R7 M460 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon R7 M460 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | GT200B | Meso |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 21 February 2016 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 984 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1125 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 27.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| Check Price |