GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 370
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R9 370. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R9 370. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 295
Radeon R9 370
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon R9 370 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 110 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 162% more power consumption, than Radeon R9 370.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 370 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1790 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 370.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 370 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 317 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 370.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 370 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Radeon R9 370 is 211 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 295.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 370 is 4601 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon R9 370. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Dota 2 is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Far Cry 5 is 585% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Fortnite is 363% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 550% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 315% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 630% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon R9 370 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GT200B | Trinidad |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 1280 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 975 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 2,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 78.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 2,496 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | 221 mm |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 5600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 336 Mh/s | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |