GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M280X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R9 M280X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R9 M280X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 295
Radeon R9 M280X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M280X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M280X here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon R9 M280X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | Not Listed |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M280X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M280X - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M280X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 342 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M280X.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M280X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Battlefield 5 is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Dota 2 is 1% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Fortnite is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R9 M280X have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R9 M280X have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Minecraft is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R9 M280X have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 14% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 11% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R9 M280X have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon R9 M280X | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | GT200B | Saturn XT |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 1 February 2015 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 2,080 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 61.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 1,792 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Bus support | Not Listed | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| Check Price |