GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M390X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R9 M390X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R9 M390X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 295
Radeon R9 M390X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M390X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M390X here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon R9 M390X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 189% more power consumption, than Radeon R9 M390X.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M390X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1788 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M390X.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M390X - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M390X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 519 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M390X.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M390X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Battlefield 5 is 345% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 170−180 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 145% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Dota 2 is 109% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Far Cry 5 is 342% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Fortnite is 213% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Forza Horizon 4 is 333% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | − | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Metro Exodus is 450% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Minecraft is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 225% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 350% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in World of Tanks is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon R9 M390X | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 3 |
| Code name | GT200B | Amethyst (XT) / Tonga |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 9 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 723 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 5,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 92.54 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | + |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| Check Price |