GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M485X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R9 M485X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R9 M485X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 295
Radeon R9 M485X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M485X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M485X here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon R9 M485X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 8 GB MB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 15% more power consumption, than Radeon R9 M485X.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M485X uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1784 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M485X.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M485X - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M485X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 519 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M485X.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M485X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M485X is 4001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Battlefield 5 is 390% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 240−250 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 159% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Dota 2 is 111% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Far Cry 5 is 385% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Fortnite is 245% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Forza Horizon 4 is 375% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | − | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Grand Theft Auto V is 215% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Metro Exodus is 525% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Minecraft is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 111% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 275% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 400% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in World of Tanks is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon R9 M485X | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 3 |
Code name | GT200B | Amethyst |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 14 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 240 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 723 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 92.54 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |