GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon RX 640
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon RX 640 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 295 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 640 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 295
Radeon RX 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 640 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon RX 640 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 478% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 640.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon RX 640 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1788 GB more memory, than Radeon RX 640.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 640 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon RX 640 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 24 MHz higher, than Radeon RX 640.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 640 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 640 is 5001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in Battlefield 5 is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in Dota 2 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in Far Cry 5 is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in Fortnite is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in Grand Theft Auto V is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in Minecraft is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon RX 640 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | GT200B | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 12 August 2019 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 1218 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1218 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 38.98 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 112.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| Check Price |