GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000
When choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000.
GeForce GTX 295
Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 - with Vega.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 - by 7 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Battlefield 5 is 263% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 109% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Dota 2 is 86% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Far Cry 5 is 242% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Fortnite is 159% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 162% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Vega |
Code name | GT200B | Vega Renoir |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 7 January 2020 |
Pipelines | 240 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M275
- Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon RX 480 mobile
- GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 vs Radeon RX 480 mobile
- Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 vs GeForce GTX 590