GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 295
Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 - with Vega.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 - by 7 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Dota 2 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Fortnite is 186% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 275% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 170% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Minecraft is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in World of Tanks is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Vega |
Code name | GT200B | Vega Raven Ridge |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 7 January 2020 |
Pipelines | 240 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1750 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M275
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
- GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 780M
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 vs GeForce GTX 780M