GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon Vega 11 mobile
When choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon Vega 11 mobile, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon Vega 11 mobile.
GeForce GTX 295
Radeon Vega 11 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Vega 11 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Vega 11 mobile here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon Vega 11 mobile | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1826% more power consumption, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Vega 11 mobile uses IGP interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Vega 11 mobile - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Vega 11 mobile - with GCN 5.0.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Vega 11 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon Vega 11 mobile have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Vega 11 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Vega 11 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Vega 11 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Vega 11 mobile in Dota 2 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Vega 11 mobile in Fortnite is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Vega 11 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Vega 11 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Vega 11 mobile in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Vega 11 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon Vega 11 mobile have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Vega 11 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Vega 11 mobile in World of Tanks is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon Vega 11 mobile | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | GT200B | Picasso |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 6 January 2019 |
Pipelines | 240 | 704 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1400 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 4,940 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 61.60 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M275
- Radeon Vega 11 mobile vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- Radeon Vega 11 mobile vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 295 vs FirePro M5950
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 4870 X2
- Radeon Vega 11 mobile vs FirePro M5950
- Radeon Vega 11 mobile vs Radeon HD 4870 X2