GeForce GTX 295 vs Tesla M6
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Tesla M6, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 295 stacks up against Tesla M6, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 295
Tesla M6
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Tesla M6 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 189% more power consumption, than Tesla M6.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Tesla M6 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1784 GB more memory, than Tesla M6.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 312 MHz higher, than Tesla M6.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tesla M6 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M6 is 4013 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 633% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 627% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 193% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Tesla M6. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 642% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 190−200 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 400% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 608% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 330% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 462% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 690% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Tesla M6 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GT200B | GM204 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1180 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 113.3 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 5.2 |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |