GeForce GTX 295 vs Tesla M60
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Tesla M60, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 295 stacks up against Tesla M60, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 295
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Tesla M60
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Tesla M60 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 300 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
- Tesla M60 has 3% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 295.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1784 GB more memory, than Tesla M60.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 685 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tesla M60 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Tesla M60 is 257 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 295.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 4013 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 616% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 609% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Tesla M60. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 628% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 381% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 591% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 325% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 875% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 450% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 650% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Tesla M60 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GT200B | GM204 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 240 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | 267 mm |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.2 |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 432 Mh/s | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |