GeForce GTX 295 vs UHD Graphics 615
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 295 and UHD Graphics 615 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 295 will be the best choice, for others UHD Graphics 615 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 295
UHD Graphics 615 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: UHD Graphics 615 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with UHD Graphics 615 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | UHD Graphics 615 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3L/LPDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1826% more power consumption, than UHD Graphics 615.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and UHD Graphics 615 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and UHD Graphics 615 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and UHD Graphics 615 - with Gen. 9 Amber Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 942 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics 615.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics 615 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Battlefield 5 is 120% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 615 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Fortnite is 31% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Grand Theft Auto V is 28% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Minecraft is 20% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 166% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | UHD Graphics 615 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Gen. 9 Amber Lake |
| Code name | GT200B | Kaby-Lake GT2 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 30 August 2018 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 24 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 25.20 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| Check Price |