FirePro M4150 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
When comparing FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 460 768MB, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 460 768MB is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro M4150
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GeForce GTX 460 768MB | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 768MB - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 40 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 2200 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 73% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Dota 2 is 66% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Fortnite is 121% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Forza Horizon 4 is 155% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Grand Theft Auto V is 94% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Metro Exodus is 333% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Minecraft is 21% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 266% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in World of Tanks is 48% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GeForce GTX 460 768MB | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Opal | |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | no data |
| Pipelines | 384 | 336 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 675 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |