GeForce GTS 160M vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTS 160M and GeForce GTX 460 768MB, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTS 160M stacks up against GeForce GTX 460 768MB, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTS 160M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 160M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 160M | GeForce GTX 460 768MB | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTS 160M is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 460 768MB - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 768MB - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 825 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2400% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 385% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Dota 2 is 220% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Fortnite is 295% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Grand Theft Auto V is 278% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 487% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | − | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in World of Tanks is 168% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 160M | GeForce GTX 460 768MB | |
Architecture | G9x | Fermi |
Code name | N10E-GS1 | |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 2 March 2009 | no data |
Pipelines | 64 | 336 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 675 MHz |
Transistor count | 505 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | |
Texture fill rate | 19 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 192 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 51 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
Gigaflops | 288 | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
Power management | 8.0 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTS 160M vs UHD Graphics 615
- GeForce GTS 160M vs Radeon HD 8730M
- GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs UHD Graphics 615
- GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs Radeon HD 8730M
- GeForce GTS 160M vs FireStream 9370
- GeForce GTS 160M vs Radeon R9 M470
- GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs FireStream 9370
- GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs Radeon R9 M470