GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs GeForce GTX 760M
When comparing GeForce GTX 460 768MB and GeForce GTX 760M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 460 768MB and GeForce GTX 760M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
GeForce GTX 760M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 760M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 760M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 768MB | GeForce GTX 760M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 768MB is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 760M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 768MB is build with Fermi architecture, and GeForce GTX 760M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 768MB is 18 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760M is 200 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Battlefield 5 is 56% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 768MB and GeForce GTX 760M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Dota 2 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Far Cry 5 is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Fortnite is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Forza Horizon 4 is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Grand Theft Auto V is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Metro Exodus is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Minecraft is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in World of Tanks is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 768MB | GeForce GTX 760M | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Code name | N14E-GL | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | no data | 30 May 2013 |
| Pipelines | 336 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 675 MHz | 657 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11 | 12 API |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 54 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |