GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs Quadro K2000M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 768MB and Quadro K2000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 768MB will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 768MB | Quadro K2000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 768MB is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 768MB is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K2000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K2000M is 70 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 768MB and Quadro K2000M is 1800 MHz.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Dota 2 is 70% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Fortnite is 121% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Forza Horizon 4 is 188% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Grand Theft Auto V is 118% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Metro Exodus is 333% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 220% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 228% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in World of Tanks is 41% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 768MB | Quadro K2000M | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Code name | N14P-Q3 | |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | no data | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 336 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 675 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | |
| Texture fill rate | 23.84 | |
| Floating-point performance | 572.2 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |