GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs Quadro M3000M
When choosing between GeForce GTX 460 768MB and Quadro M3000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 460 768MB and Quadro M3000M.
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Quadro M3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M3000M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 768MB | Quadro M3000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 768MB is used in Desktops, and Quadro M3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 768MB is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro M3000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 375 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Battlefield 5 is 210% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Dota 2 is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Far Cry 5 is 193% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Fortnite is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 186% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 132% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 210% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in World of Tanks is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 768MB | Quadro M3000M | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell |
| Code name | GM204 | |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | no data | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 336 | 1,024 |
| Core clock speed | 675 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | |
| Texture fill rate | 67.20 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,150 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11 | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 253 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |