GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs Quadro M4000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 460 768MB and Quadro M4000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 460 768MB and Quadro M4000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Quadro M4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M4000M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 768MB | Quadro M4000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 768MB is used in Desktops, and Quadro M4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 768MB is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro M4000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 3212 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Battlefield 5 is 210% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Dota 2 is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Far Cry 5 is 193% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Fortnite is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 186% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 132% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 210% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in World of Tanks is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 768MB | Quadro M4000M | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell |
| Code name | GM204 | |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | no data | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 336 | 1,280 |
| Core clock speed | 675 MHz | 975 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1013 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | |
| Texture fill rate | 78.00 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11 | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 251 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |