GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs Quadro T2000 mobile
When choosing between GeForce GTX 460 768MB and Quadro T2000 mobile, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 460 768MB and Quadro T2000 mobile.
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro T2000 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T2000 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T2000 mobile here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 768MB | Quadro T2000 mobile | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 768MB is used in Desktops, and Quadro T2000 mobile - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 768MB is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro T2000 mobile - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 900 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 6200 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 210% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Dota 2 is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 193% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Fortnite is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 186% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 132% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 210% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in World of Tanks is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 768MB | Quadro T2000 mobile | |
Architecture | Fermi | Turing |
Code name | N19P-Q3 | |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | no data | 27 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 336 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 675 MHz | 1575 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1785 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | |
Texture fill rate | 114.2 | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs FireStream 9370
- GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs Radeon R9 M470
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs FireStream 9370
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon R9 M470
- GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs Radeon R9 380X
- GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon R9 380X
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire