GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs Tesla C2075
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 768MB and Tesla C2075 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 768MB will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2075 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
6 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI
Check Price
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 460 768MB is build with Fermi architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 768MB is 101 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 1332 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−11
QHD / 1440p
2−3
4−5
low / 720p
24−27
35−40
medium / 1080p
14−16
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
high / 1080p
18−20
27−30
ultra / 1080p
16−18
21−24
QHD / 1440p
3−4
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
40−45
55−60
medium / 1080p
21−24
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
low / 768p
180−190
210−220
medium / 768p
150−160
190−200
ultra / 1080p
80−85
100−110
QHD / 1440p
45−50
65−70
4K / 2160p
30−33
30−35
high / 768p
120−130
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
medium / 768p
80−85
100−110
ultra / 1080p
50−55
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
high / 1080p
14−16
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
30−35
45−50
medium / 1080p
14−16
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
16−18
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
85−90
110−120
medium / 1080p
40−45
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
16−18
21−24
QHD / 1440p
6−7
10−11
low / 720p
40−45
60−65
medium / 1080p
21−24
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
65−70
80−85
high / 1080p
21−24
30−35
ultra / 1080p
10−11
14−16
QHD / 1440p
1−2
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
high / 1080p
8−9
10−12
ultra / 1080p
6−7
8−9
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
21−24
30−35
medium / 1080p
10−11
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
95−100
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
high / 1080p
20−22
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
45−50
60−65
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
low / 768p
40−45
60−65
medium / 768p
27−30
35−40
high / 1080p
14−16
21−24
ultra / 1080p
9−10
12−14
4K / 2160p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
low / 768p
95−100
90−95
medium / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−33
35−40
high / 768p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Fermi
Fermi 2.0
Code name
GF110
Type
Desktop
Workstation
Release date
no data
25 July 2011
Pipelines
336
448
Core clock speed
675 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
Texture fill rate
32.14
Floating-point performance
1,030.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
192 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
11
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
94 Mh/s
Check Price
