GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs Tesla M2070 Q
When comparing GeForce GTX 460 768MB and Tesla M2070 Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 460 768MB and Tesla M2070 Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Tesla M2070 Q
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 768MB | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460 768MB and Tesla M2070 Q are build with Fermi architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 768MB is 101 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 1332 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Battlefield 5 is 127% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 768MB and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 54% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
GeForce GTX 460 768MB and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Fortnite is 68% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Forza Horizon 4 is 116% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Grand Theft Auto V is 59% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Metro Exodus is 160% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Minecraft is 20% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 45% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 114% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 122% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in World of Tanks is 38% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 768MB | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
Code name | GF100 | |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | no data | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 336 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 675 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | |
Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | |
DirectX | 11 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |