FirePro M4000 vs GeForce GTX 460 SE
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M4000 and GeForce GTX 460 SE. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M4000 and GeForce GTX 460 SE. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4000 | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin & 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 354% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GeForce GTX 460 SE uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M4000 and GeForce GTX 460 SE have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 700 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 2800 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 18% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M4000 and GeForce GTX 460 SE have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 9% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 9% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 20% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 6% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 18% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 21% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 10% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4000 | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
| Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
| Code name | Cape Verde GLM | GF104 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 | 15 November 2010 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 288 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 31.2 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 748.8 gflops |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1700 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 108.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | n/a | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | 48 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |
| Check Price |