FirePro M5100 vs GeForce GTX 460 SE
In this comparison between FirePro M5100 and GeForce GTX 460 SE you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M5100 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 460 SE will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
FirePro M5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5100 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M5100 | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Check Price |
- FirePro M5100 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GeForce GTX 460 SE uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M5100 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- FirePro M5100 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5100 is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 575 MHz higher, than FirePro M5100.
- FirePro M5100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M5100 is 2800 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro M5100 and GeForce GTX 460 SE have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Fortnite is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
FirePro M5100 and GeForce GTX 460 SE have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
FirePro M5100 and GeForce GTX 460 SE have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
FirePro M5100 and GeForce GTX 460 SE have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. |
Full Specs
FirePro M5100 | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
Code name | Venus | GF104 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 1 October 2013 | 15 November 2010 |
Pipelines | 640 | 288 |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.00 | 31.2 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 992.0 gflops | 748.8 gflops |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 108.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 108 Mh/s | 48 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro M5100 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000
- FirePro M5100 vs Quadro 5000M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro 5000M
- FirePro M5100 vs GeForce GTX 470M
- FirePro M5100 vs Quadro M600M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 470M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro M600M