FirePro M5950 vs GeForce GTX 460 SE
When comparing FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 460 SE, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 460 SE is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M5950 | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 328% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GeForce GTX 460 SE uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 460 SE have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 575 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 460 SE are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 800 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 71% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 72% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 460 SE have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 32% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 41% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 63% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 52% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 19% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 62% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
low / 768p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 88% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 23% more, than FirePro M5950. |
Full Specs
FirePro M5950 | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
Architecture | Terascale 2 | Fermi |
Code name | Whistler-XT | GF104 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 13 April 2011 | 15 November 2010 |
Pipelines | 480 | 288 |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Transistor count | 716 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 31.2 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 748.8 gflops |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | 108.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | n/a | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | 48 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | MXM-A | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |