FirePro M7740 vs GeForce GTX 460 SE
When choosing between FirePro M7740 and GeForce GTX 460 SE, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M7740 and GeForce GTX 460 SE.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
FirePro M7740 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M7740 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M7740 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M7740 | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin & 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 150% more power consumption, than FirePro M7740.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro M7740 and GeForce GTX 460 SE have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- FirePro M7740 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - in Desktops.
- FirePro M7740 is build with Terascale 1 architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 650 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 and GeForce GTX 460 SE are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 700 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 26% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro M7740 and GeForce GTX 460 SE have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 23% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 22% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 25% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 38% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 8% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 12% more, than FirePro M7740. |
Full Specs
FirePro M7740 | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
Architecture | Terascale 1 | Fermi |
Code name | RV740 | GF104 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 4 August 2009 | 15 November 2010 |
Pipelines | 640 | 288 |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Transistor count | 826 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 20.80 | 31.2 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 832.0 gflops | 748.8 gflops |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 54.14 GB/s | 108.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.1 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro M7740 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4870
- FirePro M7740 vs GeForce 9800M GT SLI
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Mobility Radeon HD 4870
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce 9800M GT SLI
- FirePro M7740 vs GeForce GTX 470M
- FirePro M7740 vs Quadro M600M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 470M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro M600M