FirePro W4190M vs GeForce GTX 460 SE
In this comparison between FirePro W4190M and GeForce GTX 460 SE you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W4190M will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 460 SE will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W4190M | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin & 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 460 SE uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W4190M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - in Desktops.
- FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 475 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
- FirePro W4190M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 2300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 90% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W4190M and GeForce GTX 460 SE have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 29% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 47% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 120% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 63% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 175% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 20% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 112% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 35% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W4190M | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
| Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
| Code name | Mars XTX? | GF104 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 12 November 2015 | 15 November 2010 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 288 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 1,950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 31.2 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 748.8 gflops |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1700 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 108.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |
| Check Price |