FirePro W5170M vs GeForce GTX 460 SE
When choosing between FirePro W5170M and GeForce GTX 460 SE, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W5170M and GeForce GTX 460 SE.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
FirePro W5170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W5170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W5170M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W5170M | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin & 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Check Price |
- FirePro W5170M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GeForce GTX 460 SE uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W5170M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- FirePro W5170M is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - in Desktops.
- FirePro W5170M is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - with Fermi.
- FirePro W5170M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5170M is 2800 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W5170M and GeForce GTX 460 SE have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Dota 2 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Far Cry 5 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Fortnite is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Forza Horizon 4 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Minecraft is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
FirePro W5170M and GeForce GTX 460 SE have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in World of Tanks is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. |
Full Specs
FirePro W5170M | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
Code name | Tropo | GF104 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 15 November 2010 |
Pipelines | 640 | 288 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 37.00 | 31.2 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops | 748.8 gflops |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 108.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
AppAcceleration | + | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W5170M vs Quadro P520
- FirePro W5170M vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book 940M GDDR5
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro P520
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book 940M GDDR5
- FirePro W5170M vs GeForce GTX 470M
- FirePro W5170M vs Quadro M600M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 470M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro M600M