GeForce 920A vs GeForce GTX 460 SE
When comparing GeForce 920A and GeForce GTX 460 SE, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 920A and GeForce GTX 460 SE is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce 920A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 460 SE
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
GeForce 920A | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 354% more power consumption, than GeForce 920A.
- GeForce 920A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 460 SE uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 920A has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce 920A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 346 MHz higher, than GeForce 920A.
- GeForce 920A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 920A is 302 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2100% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 321% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 182% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 227% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 252% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 425% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | − | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 148% more, than GeForce 920A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 920A | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GK208B | GF104 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 15 November 2010 |
Pipelines | 384 | 288 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Transistor count | 915 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 31.2 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 748.8 gflops |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 108.8 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 3.5 | + |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |