GeForce 9800M GT SLI vs GeForce GTX 460 SE
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 9800M GT SLI and GeForce GTX 460 SE, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 9800M GT SLI stacks up against GeForce GTX 460 SE, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
GeForce 9800M GT SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 9800M GT SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 9800M GT SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce 9800M GT SLI | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 15% more power consumption, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI has 511 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - in Desktops.
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI is build with G9x architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 800 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 900 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 71% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 46% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 9800M GT SLI and GeForce GTX 460 SE have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 100−105 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 39% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 32% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 36% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 57% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 46% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 12% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 44% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 53% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 23% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. |
Full Specs
GeForce 9800M GT SLI | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
Architecture | G9x | Fermi |
Code name | NB9E-GT2 | GF104 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 15 July 2008 | 15 November 2010 |
Pipelines | 192 | 288 |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Transistor count | 1508 Million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | + |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI vs FirePro M7740
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI vs GeForce 9800M GTS SLI
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs FirePro M7740
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce 9800M GTS SLI
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI vs GeForce GTX 470M
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI vs Quadro M600M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 470M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro M600M