GeForce GT 445M vs GeForce GTX 460 SE
In this comparison between GeForce GT 445M and GeForce GTX 460 SE you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 445M will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 460 SE will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
GeForce GT 445M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 445M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 445M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 445M | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 328% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 445M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GT 445M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GT 445M is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 445M and GeForce GTX 460 SE are build with Fermi architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 120 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 445M.
- GeForce GT 445M and GeForce GTX 460 SE are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 450 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 445M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 445M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 69% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 445M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 59% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 105% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 300% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 95% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 1800% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 533% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
low / 768p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 500% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 43% more, than GeForce GT 445M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 445M | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
Code name | N11E-GE | GF104 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 3 September 2010 | 15 November 2010 |
Pipelines | 144 | 288 |
Core clock speed | 1180 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 10.6 billion/sec | 31.2 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 339.8 gflops | 748.8 gflops |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 60.0 GB/s | 108.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.1 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 144 | 288 |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | + |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |