GeForce GT 750M vs GeForce GTX 460 SE
In this comparison between GeForce GT 750M and GeForce GTX 460 SE you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 750M will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 460 SE will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
GeForce GT 750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 750M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 750M | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 750M.
- GeForce GT 750M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 460 SE uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GT 750M has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GT 750M is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 750M is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 333 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 750M.
- GeForce GT 750M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 750M is 300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 46% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GT 750M and GeForce GTX 460 SE have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 30% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 22% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 41% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 60% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 34% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 12% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 70% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GeForce GT 750M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 750M | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | N14P-GT | GF104 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 April 2013 | 15 November 2010 |
Pipelines | 384 | 288 |
Core clock speed | 967 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 967 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.94 | 31.2 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 742.7 gflops | 748.8 gflops |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 - 5000 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB/s | 108.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.1 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | + |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | 48 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3/GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |