GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 460 SE
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and GeForce GTX 460 SE you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 460 SE will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin & 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 460 SE uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 265 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 8300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 241% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 257% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 96% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Dota 2 is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Fortnite is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Minecraft is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 264% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
Architecture | Turing | Fermi |
Code name | N18P-G62 Max-Q | GF104 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 2 April 2020 | 15 November 2010 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 288 |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.80 | 31.2 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 108.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | N/A |
CUDA | 7.5 | + |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 960
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 960
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 470M
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Quadro M600M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 470M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro M600M