GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs GeForce GTX 460 SE
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 260M SLI and GeForce GTX 460 SE, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 260M SLI stacks up against GeForce GTX 460 SE, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 260M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 260M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 260M SLI | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | |
Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 150 Watt.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 750 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 750 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
GeForce GTX 260M SLI and GeForce GTX 460 SE have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 260M SLI and GeForce GTX 460 SE have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GeForce GTX 260M SLI and GeForce GTX 460 SE have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
GeForce GTX 260M SLI and GeForce GTX 460 SE have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
GeForce GTX 260M SLI and GeForce GTX 460 SE have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 260M SLI | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
Architecture | G9x | Fermi |
Code name | NB9E-GTX | GF104 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 2 March 2009 | 15 November 2010 |
Pipelines | 224 | 288 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Transistor count | 1508 Million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 950 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs Radeon R9 M375X
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs GeForce MX230
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon R9 M375X
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce MX230
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs GeForce GTX 470M
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs Quadro M600M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 470M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro M600M