GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 460M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 SE and GeForce GTX 460M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 SE will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 460M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
GeForce GTX 460M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 460M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 460M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | GeForce GTX 460M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1536 MB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 460M has 1535 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 460M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE and GeForce GTX 460M are build with Fermi architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460M is 50 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE and GeForce GTX 460M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 450 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 114% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 111% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and GeForce GTX 460M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 49% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 47% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 120% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 63% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 175% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 160% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 122% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | GeForce GTX 460M | |
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
Code name | GF104 | N11E-GS |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 3 September 2010 |
Pipelines | 288 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,170 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 16.1 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 518.4 gflops |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 60.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | + |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | 33 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |