GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 675M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and GeForce GTX 675M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 460 SE stacks up against GeForce GTX 675M, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
GeForce GTX 675M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 675M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 675M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | GeForce GTX 675M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 50% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 675M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 675M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 675M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 675M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE and GeForce GTX 675M are build with Fermi architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 680 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE and GeForce GTX 675M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 200 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and GeForce GTX 675M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Dota 2 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Fortnite is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and GeForce GTX 675M have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and GeForce GTX 675M have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and GeForce GTX 675M have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and GeForce GTX 675M have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and GeForce GTX 675M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and GeForce GTX 675M have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and GeForce GTX 675M have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and GeForce GTX 675M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | GeForce GTX 675M | |
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
Code name | GF104 | N13E-GS1 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 22 March 2012 |
Pipelines | 288 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 620 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 39.7 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 952.3 gflops |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 96.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 288 | 384 |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | PCI Express 2.0 |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | + |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | + |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | Up to 2048x1536 |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | 59 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 470M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro M600M
- GeForce GTX 675M vs GeForce GTX 470M
- GeForce GTX 675M vs Quadro M600M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs FirePro M6100
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- GeForce GTX 675M vs FirePro M6100
- GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000