GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 965M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and GeForce GTX 965M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 460 SE stacks up against GeForce GTX 965M, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
GeForce GTX 965M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 965M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 965M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | GeForce GTX 965M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 965M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 965M has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 965M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and GeForce GTX 965M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 356 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 965M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 965M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 800 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Battlefield 5 is 115% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Dota 2 is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Fortnite is 85% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Forza Horizon 4 is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Metro Exodus is 112% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in World of Tanks is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | GeForce GTX 965M | |
Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell |
Code name | GF104 | N16E-GS, N16E-GR |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 5 January 2015 |
Pipelines | 288 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 944 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 / 1151 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 2,940 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 73.60 |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 2,355 gflops |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 2500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
G-SYNC support | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1 |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 288 | 1024 |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | + |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | + |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | 226 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
GameStream | + | |
GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
BatteryBoost | + | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |