GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce MX150
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 SE and GeForce MX150 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 SE will be the best choice, for others GeForce MX150 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
GeForce MX150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX150 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | GeForce MX150 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 10 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 1400% more power consumption, than GeForce MX150.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce MX150 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce MX150 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX150 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and GeForce MX150 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 168 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce MX150 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 4308 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Battlefield 5 is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and GeForce MX150 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Dota 2 is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Fortnite is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | GeForce MX150 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Pascal |
Code name | GF104 | N17S-G1 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 16 May 2017 |
Pipelines | 288 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1468 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1532 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 24.91 |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 1,127 gflops |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 40.1 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | 6.1 |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 470M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro M600M
- GeForce MX150 vs GeForce GTX 470M
- GeForce MX150 vs Quadro M600M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Iris Graphics 540
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
- GeForce MX150 vs Iris Graphics 540
- GeForce MX150 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000